The community natural right and the prepolitical community: a contribution of francisco Suárez to the “defense of indians” in america
The community natural right and the prepolitical community: a contribution of Francisco Suárez to the “defense of indians” in America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35319/consciencias.20171757Abstract
Francisco Suárez had a great historical vision in discovering the community natural right. This right was essential to the “defense of the Indians” in America. The Castilians found several territories without state organization in America. Ginés de Sepúlveda considered that this situation in which they did not have a State, placed them into a situation of “slaves by nature” and therefore they did not have the right to property and self-government. To combat this nefarious idea, which was supported by the conquerors, Suárez advocated that the communities and populations lacking of political structure still had extensive legal capacity and therefore were assignees of private and public rights backed up by a natural community right. Suárez’s community natural right would currently be equivalent to public natural right, a field which is practically not dealt with today, since specialists only speak of positive public right. The natural community right of Suárez is a pre- state and pre-political divine institution that serves as the basis for positive law in all its branches, just as natural law is the foundation of all positive laws. This community natural right is distinguished by: a) being natural, it is prior to the State and therefore affects the family, the tribe and imperfect social groups, which have obligations and congenital natural rights by which these populations and individuals are assignees in any cultural and political situation; b) Being pre-state and pre-political, the community natural right is a natural social right, typical of legal persons who are members of the universal human community.
Downloads
References
E. CORECCO, Il sacramento, del matrimonio cardine della costituzione della Chiesa, in Ius et Communio. Scritti di Diritto Canonico, a cura di G. Borgonovo - A. Cattaneo, Casale Monferrato 1997
E. ELORDUY, La igualdad jurídica según Suárez, en Homenaje al Dr. Eximio P. Suárez, S.J. en el IV centenario de su nacimiento, Acta Salmanticensis Derecho I/2 (1948)
ELORDUY, La soberanía popular según Francisco Suárez, CLVII
ELORDUY, La soberanía popular según Francisco Suárez, CLIX
ELORDUY, La soberanía popular según Francisco Suárez, CLXV
F.T. BACIERO RUÍZ, La ley moral natural según Francisco Suárez, en Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 14 (2007) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v14i.6242
F. CUEVAS CANCINO, La doctrina de Suárez sobre el Derecho Natural, Madrid 1952
G. AMBROSETTI, Diritto naturale cristiano.Profili di metodo, di storia e di teoría, Roma 1970
G. AMBROSETTI, Il diritto naturale della riforma cattolica. Una giustificazione storica del sistema diSuarez, Milano 1951
G. KALINOWSKI, Lógica y filosofía del derecho subjetivo, en ID., Concepto, fundamento y concreción del derecho, Buenos Aires 1982
J. CAAMAÑO MARTÍNEZ, La mutabilidad del derecho natural en Suárez, en Actas del Congreso Internacional de Filosofía, Barcelona, 4-10 octubre 1948, con motivo del Centenario de los filósofos Francisco Suárez y Jaime Balmes, Madrid 1949, III, 61-73
J. CARRERAS Y ARTAU, Doctrinas de Francisco Suárez acerca del Derecho de Gentes y sus relaciones con el Derecho Natural, Gerona 1921
J. FINNIS, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford 1980, traducción española de A. Perrot, Ley Natural y Derechos Naturales, Buenos Aires 2000
L. LEGAZ LACAMBRA, Discurso, en Suárez y el sentido cristiano del poder político, Madrid 1967
L. RECASENS SICHES, La filosofia del derecho de Francisco Suarez, con un estudio previo sobre sus antecedentes en la patristica y en la escolastica, Madrid 1927
M., HOÈEVAR, Desintegración de la teoría del derecho natural, en Dikaiosyne 9 (2002) 177-180
RECASENS, Filosofía de la interpretación del derecho, 1956
ROMMEN, H., The State in Catholic Thought, 180; DF, III, 2o, 17.
ROMMEN, H., Die ewige wiederkehr des naturrechts, Múnchen, traducción italiana de G. Ambrosetti, L’eterno retorno del diritto naturale, Roma 1965; P. C. WESTERMAN, The Disintegration of Natural Law Theory. Aquinas to Finnis, Leiden 1998.
S. CASTELLOTE CUBELLS, Las relaciones humanas en Suarez, en Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofia 7 (1980) DOI: https://doi.org/10.36576/summa.658
SAN JUAN CRISÓSTOMO, Homilia 23, I y 3.
V. ABRIL CASTELLÓ, Perspectivas del iusnaturalismo Suareciano, en Corpus Hisp. de pace XII, Madrid 1974, LVI-LXX
W. MAY, The Natural Law Doctrine of Francis Suárez, en The New Scholasticism 58 (1984) 409-423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas19845842
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Con-Sciencias Sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.